Budlaw wrote:
nottins wrote: Must me those dodgy made in China GPSr's that are sending people to the wrong side of the road, I found it in the first place I looked  As to your second question, I've no idea. Could be that you have one of the dodgy chinese gizmos that worked in your favour on this occasion?!  Not that you say that the cache was at gz as displayed on your technology - assuming you were using it.Atleast you have a pen to sign the log once you find it Raymondo     
nottins wrote:
Must me those dodgy made in China GPSr's that are sending people to the wrong side of the road, I found it in the first place I looked As to your second question, I've no idea. Could be that you have one of the dodgy chinese gizmos that worked in your favour on this occasion?! Not that you say that the cache was at gz as displayed on your technology - assuming you were using it. 
Must me those dodgy made in China GPSr's that are sending people to the wrong side of the road, I found it in the first place I looked
As to your second question, I've no idea.
nottins wrote:
They already have their own cache: www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.as...7f-9b11-c754262e71fa True, Steve, but it would appear that the official co-ords are somewhat adrift and despite suggestions of more accurate ones nothing has been changed. Maybe that's why they want a GPS, to confirm or rebut the alleged inaccuracy!? And why are we discussing this under Landmark Challenge topic?
They already have their own cache: www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.as...7f-9b11-c754262e71fa
|
|
|
|||
|
